Which action best supports identifying energy-related hazards on a site?

• A. Using the Energy Wheel during the job briefing
• B. Ignoring energy sources
• C. Relying only on training manuals
• D. Waiting for management to point out hazards

Answer: (A)

Actively identifying energy-related hazards during the pre-job briefing using a tool like the Energy Wheel. This approach makes energy a focal point of planning, so every potential energy source—electrical, mechanical, hydraulic, pneumatic, thermal, chemical, and stored energy in springs or capacitors—gets considered before work starts. The Energy Wheel guides the team through a structured discussion to map out where energy is present, how it could be released, and what controls are needed to keep everyone safe. It promotes clear communication, ensures proper isolation and de-energizing steps, and establishes agreed-upon procedures, such as lockout/tagout and testing for zero energy, tailored to the specific task and site conditions. By involving the whole crew in this proactive assessment, hazards are more likely to be identified and mitigated than if you relied on manuals, waited for someone else to point them out, or ignored energy sources.